Kapogianni, Eleni, Elder, Chi-Hé
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3702-5397 and Baxter-Webb, Ibi
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-7469
(2025)
The joke and the joker: Ascribing accountability for offensive humour in stand-up comedy.
Pragmatics & Cognition, 32 (1).
pp. 39-68.
ISSN 1569-9943
Preview |
PDF (kap R2)
- Accepted Version
Download (252kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The ongoing and divisive discourse regarding the use of offensive humour in stand-up comedy is taking place both off-stage and on-stage: comedians use jokes that target sensitive characteristics ostensibly to show that no topic is ‘off limits’, while also taking a stance against those who argue for more empathetic comedy that does not reinforce stereotypes and discriminatory beliefs. Taking Jimmy Carr’s ‘holocaust joke’ (2021) as a case study, we examine the entire life-cycle of jokes from their live-performance context to entering the public sphere, questioning what a joker can be held accountable for in stand-up comedy. Specifically, we look at the performance frame, comedian personality and persona, and how different types of audience may react to a joke, in order to shed light on what exactly it is that the producer of an offensive joke can, or should, be held accountable for.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
Tools
Tools